| | |
OMB COST ESTIMATE
FOR PAY-AS-YOU-GO CALCULATIONS
Report No: 530
Date: 11/27/00
- LAW NUMBER: P.L.106-394 (H.R. 2842)
- BILL TITLE: Federal Employees Health Benefits
Children's Equity Act of 2000
- BILL PURPOSE: Authorizes the Federal Government to
enroll an employee and his or her
family in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) when a State court orders
the employee to provide health insurance coverage for a child of the employee, but the
employee fails to provide the coverage.
- OMB ESTIMATE: P.L. 106-394 requires the
Federal Government to enroll an employee in
the FEHBP under family coverage when a state court orders the employee to provide health
insurance coverage for his or her child, but the employee fails to provide the coverage. This
will increase both government and enrollee contributions to the FEHBP Trust Fund, and
increase premiums paid from the FEHBP Trust Fund to insurance carriers. The government
contributions part of the premiums paid out to the carriers will increase direct spending by $10
million over the 2001-2005 period. The law also modifies application of the earnings test used
in determining supplemental benefits paid by the Federal Employees' Retirement System.
OMB estimates that this provision will have negligible effects over the five years.
|
(Fiscal years; in millions of
dollars) |
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Net costs.................................... |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
- CBO ESTIMATE:
|
(Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) |
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Net costs.................................... |
0 |
-1 |
-2 |
-3 |
-4 |
-3 |
- EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OMB AND CBO ESTIMATES:
CBO scored the reduced Federal outlays for Medicaid and the State Children's Health
Insurance Program resulting from the mandatory family coverage as direct savings. OMB did
not score such savings, because it considers this impact to be indirect.
- CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUE LEGISLATION
ENACTED TO DATE:
|
(Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) |
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Outlay effect.............. |
34 |
790 |
1,435 |
1,570 |
2,092 |
2,046 |
Receipt effect............ |
-8 |
-620 |
-699 |
-747 |
-786 |
-775 |
Net costs.................... |
42 |
1,410 |
2,134 |
2,317 |
2,878 |
2,821 |
NOTE: The cumulative effect of direct spending
and revenue legislation enacted to date is currently
estimated to result in an end-of-session sequester. The Administration looks forward to working with
the Congress to ensure that an unintended sequester does not occur.
| |